Utina Lost, Now Found Proves Fort Caroline in GA

Three Indian tribes that the French interacted with on the May River provide further evidence that the Altamaha River in Georgia, not the St. John’s River in Florida, was one-in-the-same as the May. These villages were Utina, Patica, and Alecamani. All are shown on maps dating back to at least 1591 as being on the same river system as French Fort Caroline. Only the state of Georgia is known to have had three such tribes living in close proximity to one another.

Utina & Paticos

It is widely accepted by archaeologists and historians that a tribe called the Utinahica lived along the western portion of the Altamaha River.[i] A search for a Spanish mission to this tribe, called the Mission Santa Isabel de Utinahica, is currently being conducted by the Fernbank Museum along the Altamaha.[ii] One possible location for this mission is at the Sansavilla Bluffs region along this river.[iii] At this location, archaeologists have found large quantities of Spanish artifacts dating to the mission period. It is thought the name Sansavilla is a corrupted form of Sans Ysavella (Santa Isabel). Although at present it is not believed that this is the location of the original Santa Isabel Mission but a later version when the Utinahica moved down river to escape raids from hostile tribes.[iv]

But this begs the question: if the Utina lived upriver from Fort Caroline and the fort was supposedly on the St. John’s River in Florida why would the Spanish have built a mission for the Utina on the Altamaha River in Georgia? This suggests the fort was on the same river as the mission: the Altamaha River.

Additionally, in William Bartram’s account of his travels among the Muscogee tribe in Georgia in 1774 he notes that the Muscogees:

“…never ceased war against the numerous and potent bands of Indians who then surrounded and cramped the English plantations, as the Savannas, Ogeeches, Wapoos, Santees, Yamasees, Utinas, Icosans, Paticos, and others until they extirpated them.”[v]

The Savannas lived along the Savannah River, the river that serves as the boundary between South Carolina and Georgia. The Ogeeches lived along the Ogeechee River, the first major river south of the Savannah River in Georgia. It is unknown who the Wapoos were but the Santees, also known as the Sattees[vi], likely lived along the Satilla River which is south of the Ogeechee River. (An 1823 map shows this river named Santila River. Since the Santee were also known as the Sattee, this likely explains why the river was known as both the Santi-la and Sati-la River. See “Dakota Sioux Once Lived in Georgia?“)

This evidence reveals that Bartram was describing Georgia tribes living along Georgia rivers. He next lists Yamasees, another known Georgia tribe, and the Utinas, likely one-in-the-same as Utinahica. (Hica means “village”[vii] thus Utinahica simply means Utina village.) It stands to reason that Bartram’s Utina also lived in Georgia as did the last two tribes, Icosans, and Paticos.

The French captain Rene de Laudonniere recorded two of these tribes, the Utina and Patico, as living near Fort Caroline. First the Utina:

“They made known by signs that the soldier who was sought was not there but presently was at the home of King Molona, a vassal of another great king, identified by them as Olata Ouae Outina.”[viii]

Next, the Patico:

“Their sail was no sooner discovered along our coast than a king of the place, named Patica, living eight leagues distant from our fort and one of my good allies, sent an Indian to tell me that he had discovered a ship along the coast and that he believed it to be of our nation.”[ix]

The 1591 map Floridae Americae Provinciae Recens[x] by Jacques Le Moyne, Fort Caroline’s resident artist, was the first to show these locations in association with the fort.

Detail from 1591 map showing Carolina (Fort Caroline) and Patica.

Detail from 1591 map showing Utina (top left), Carolina (Fort Caroline) & Patica (bottom right.)

In addition to the coastal Patica, Le Moyne’s map also shows the Utina living up the May River inside a crescent-shaped lake near a tribe called the Patchica (Pati-hica?), again likely associated with Laudonniere’s Patica and Bartram’s Paticos.

The 1625 map Florida et Regions Vicinae shows the Utina living up the River of May near the Patiqua, likely one-in-the-same as Bartram’s Paticos and Laudonniere’s Patica.

1625 map shows Utina near Patiqua and upriver from Allicamani.

(Note: Native American town names often ended in the following suffixes: -cua, -koa, -qua, -quah. All four are pronounced the same. Sometimes these were shortened to –co and –ka/-ca. Thus Patiqua would be the same as Patico or Patica. The –ica suffix could also be a shortened form of –hica. Regardless, all these suffixes indicate the same thing: “village.” This was likely a way for members of the same tribe living in different villages to distinguish one from the other. Thus the tribe was called Pati and its villages were Patica, Patico, Patiqua, Patchica, etc.)

Thus, the evidence shows:

  • the French recorded that tribes named Patica and Utina lived near their fort on the May River
  • William Bartram recorded two such tribes, the Utina and Patico, living in Georgia.
  • The Spanish built a mission to one of these tribes, the Utina, on the Altamaha River in Georgia

This supports the hypothesis that the Altamaha River in Georgia was the May River, the site of Fort Caroline.

Quest for Utina

Is there enough evidence to try and find the actual location where the Utina lived?

The 1625 map and the 1591 Le Moyne map both show the Utina living upriver from the Allicamani and located not on the river but some distance inland from the river beyond a fork in the river.

The most detailed directions to Utina come not from the French but the Spanish. After conquering Fort Caroline, the Spanish changed the names of both the fort and river to San Mateo. They then set out to meet the Utina. According to Spanish accounts they travelled 20 leagues (52 miles) up the May/San Mateo River from Fort Caroline/Fort San Mateo and then walked another 5 leagues (13.1 miles) to reach Utina:

“Up to this time Menendez had never navigated upstream on the San Mateo River. He now did so, and ascended this river for upwards of fifty leagues with the intention of establishing friendly relations with the various caciques. He went ashore after he had covered a distance of twenty leagues. He then set out cross-country with the aid of a compass and walked five leagues across some very fine plains, all in the land of the cacique Aotina. A league from Aotina’s village he sent the cacique a present and word that the Adelantado had come to visit him.”[xi]

According to the “Altamaha River State Canoe Guide[xii],” fifty two river miles upriver from the proposed site of Fort Caroline near modern-day 2-Way Fish Camp in Darien, GA would bring one to Johnston Station Landing located where Highway 84 crosses the Altamaha River. This is the location of Doctortown formerly called Aleck Town. (Aleck means “doctor” in the Muskogean language.) It was also here that the important Native American road called the Alachua Trail crossed the Altamaha River. (Alachua = Aleck-cua or “Aleck Village?”/ Doctortown?)

Le Moyne’s map showed that Utina was located in the center of a crescent-shaped lake. Are there any crescent-shaped lakes 13.1 miles from Doctortown? In fact there are.

Google “terrain” view of Goose Pond. (“Satellite” view reveals pond is now mostly dried up.)

Twelve and a half miles north east of this location between Ludowici and Allenhurst is a crescent-shaped lake called Goose Pond (although satellite views show this lake has almost dried up today.) This is very close to the Spanish estimate of 13.1 miles. Could this lake be the one Le Moyne drew on his maps as the location of the Utina?

Goose Pond is also only 16 miles from Sansavilla Bluff, a possible location of the Santa Isabel de Utinahica mission. If one were to build a mission to the Utina it would make sense to do so relatively close to their main town. The Sansavilla Bluff site fits the bill.

Le Moyne’s map shows Utina located inside crescent lake near Patchica

Map showing two possible Utina locations in relationship to Doctortown and Sansavilla Bluff. Click on tabs & blue/green lines for information and zoom in to see details.

Also near Sansavilla Bluff are the modern place names of Aleck Island, Alex Creek (Aleck Creek?), and Doctor Creek (Aleck Creek?). Interestingly, the 1625 map shows Utina located just upriver from a town called Alecamani. It also shows it located after a fork or branch of the main river channel. Doctor Creek does branch off here from the Altamaha and is a substantial creek system.

Satellite view of pond on Fort Stewart military base that matches Le Moyne’s map illustration.

Although this site appears to fit Menendez’s travel itinerary the best another possibility exists nineteen miles north of this location where lies another crescent-shaped lake northeast of Glennville on the Fort Stewart Military Reservation. This distance is somewhat greater than the 13.1 miles the Spanish claimed but if one travels upriver several more miles and disembarks it is precisely 13.7 miles to the center of the crescent-shaped lake. This lake has not dried up and is still visible from satellite images. And it is the exact shape and orientation of the crescent-shaped lake on Le Moyne’s map.

Unfortunately, no archaeological work has ever been done at either of these two locations to determine if an Indian village was located there. In the Spring of 2014 I participated with the Fort Caroline Archaeology Project in scouting a potential Utina site west of Glennville, Georgia. TFCAP’s archaeologist did shovel tests at the site but the results were negative. Neither of the two sites listed above were tested at that time.

(Above: 360 degree panorama of TFCAP exploring possible Utina site west of Glennville, GA in Spring 2014. Results of archaeological investigations were negative.)


The Allecamany is the third tribe which helps locate Fort Caroline on the Altamaha River. The French leader at Fort Caroline, Laudonniere, noted:

“…six Indians arrived from the land of Chief Allicamany…they spoke of the amiable alliance that Allicamany wished to enter into with me.”[xiii]

Allicamany is composed of two root words: allic + amany. As previously noted, allic means “doctor” in the Muskogean language of the Creek Indians. Yet amany has no translation in Creek. It does translate in Siouan, however. Mani means “walk” and amani means “to walk toward on or over, to walk toward for a purpose.”[xiv] Thus Alecamani could mean “to walk towards Aleck (Town).” Or simply, “the way to Aleck.” The fact this tribe’s name is translatable in Siouan suggests Allicamany was a Siouan tribe related to the Santee on the Satilla River to the south and Ogeechees on the Ogeechee River to the north. Tamaha is also a Siouan word meaning “Standing Bull.”

Le Moyne’s 1591 map shows Alecamany (curiously misspelled Alimacani like the Spanish) at the mouth of the May River on the north side. Other maps such as the 1625 Florida et Regions Vicinae show the Alecamani upriver from the mouth and downriver from the Utina just before the first fork of the May River.

The first major fork in the Altamaha upriver from Fort Caroline is at Doctor’s Creek (Aleck Creek?). Doctor’s Creek is a substantial creek system with two of its branches coming within two miles of the crescent-shaped lake I believe has the strongest possibility of being the location of Utina. Five miles downriver from Doctor’s Creek is Alex Creek (Aleck Creek?) Seven miles further downriver is Sansavilla Bluff where the abundance of Spanish artifacts were found as well as evidence of a longstanding Native American settlement. An additional eight miles downriver is an island named Aleck Island. (Aleck Island is located just 14 miles upstream from my proposed site for Fort Caroline.) These Aleck place names are situated in the same area where the 1625 map places Alecamani.

The Creek Nation controlled this area until 1766 when they relinquished ownership to the British and moved further upriver. A 1769 survey map shows their new village was identified as “Doctor Town an Indian Settlement.” Thus Doctor Town/Aleck Town was clearly a Creek Indian settlement as its name suggested. If the Alecamani were Siouan they likely resided downriver from these Aleck place names. Le Moyne’s map shows Alecamani at the mouth of the river while other maps place them further upriver. This suggests Alecamani (Way to Aleck) was a province with many villages from the mouth of the Altamaha River up to the Muskogean town of Aleck. The chief of this province was Satouriona (Sati-uriona?) which supports the idea this was a Siouan tribe since Sati was another name for Santee.[xv]

Doctortown and the Fevertree

The Muskogean aleck or “doctor” was the most prominent placename on the lower section of the Altamaha River. Both the name of a major trading path, the Alachua Trail, and rival tribe, Alecamani, seem to point travelers to this location. According to researchers, “The Alachua Trail, a north-south route for Indians and other travelers, was well known in the colonial period of America, a fact pointing to long aboriginal use. It started at the Altamaha River in Georgia and continued to the Alachua Lands around Micanopy, Florida.”[xvi] William Bartram traveled this trail and said it went as far north as Virginia. So what was so valuable at Aleck Town that Native Americans would travel so far to get?

A French resident of Fort Caroline sent a letter home which might answer this question. He noted that a variety of cinchona tree grew near the fort. The cinchona is a tree that only grows in the Andes region of South America and is the source for quinine, a cure for malaria. Coincidentally, William Bartram discovered a relative of the cinchona called the Georgia bark or fevertree growing near Doctortown. More importantly, the current range of this tree is limited to the rivers and coast of Georgia. The tree doesn’t grow in the area of the St. John’s River where academics believe Fort Caroline was located.[xvii]

So not only does this provide further evidence that the Altamaha was the location of Fort Caroline but it also explains why Aleck was such a prominent place name. Fevertree bark was a powerful medicine that could save lives and it only grew in a limited area of South Georgia including at Aleck Town (Doctor Town.) This explains why both a major trading path, the Alachua Trail, and neighboring Indian province, Alecamani, were directing travelers to this location.


Two of the tribes the French reported living near Fort Caroline, the Patica and Utina, were said to live in Georgia by William Bartram. No independent accounts of these tribes living on the St. John’s River have ever been made. The placename aleck which was part of the name of another tribe recorded near Fort Caroline, has an extensive history on the Altamaha River but none on the St. John’s River. And the medicinal plant that’s the raison detre for this placename, the Georgia bark or fevertree, grows on the Altamaha but not the St. John’s.

It seems clear that the Patica, Alecamani and Utina were situated on the Altamaha River in the exact same locations where French maps placed them on the May River. This provides more evidence that the Altamaha and River of May are one-in-the-same.

[Based on the paper “Locations of Utina, Paticos and Allicamani Offer Further Evidence Fort Caroline on Altamaha River.


[i] “Utinahica.” Wikipedia.org. Accessed online 16 May 2014 at < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utinahica>.

[ii] “The Santa Isabel de Utinahica Project.” FernbankMuseum.org. Accessed online 16 May 2014 at < http://www.fernbankmuseum.org/research-collections/the-santa-isabel-de-utinahica-project/>.

[iii] Elliot, Dan. “Sansavilla Bluf: Survey at the Crossroads of the Colonial Georgia Frontier.” LAMAR Institute. Accessed online 13 January 2017 at < http://www.thelamarinstitute.org/images/PDFs/publication_63.pdf>.

[iv] Worth, John. “The Early 17th Century Locations of Tama and Utinahica.” Historic Indian Period Archaeology of the Georgia Coastal Plain. University of Georgia, p. A-5. Accessed online 13 January 2017 at < http://uwf.edu/jworth/Worth%201994_Tama.pdf>.

[v] Bartram, William. “Settlements and Migrations of the Muscogulges.” in Hernando de Soto and Florida. Edited by Barnard Shipp, Philadelphia. 1881: p.642.

[vi] Daniels, Gary C. “Dakota Sioux Once Lived in Georgia?” LostWorlds.org. Accessed online 13 January 2017 at < http://lostworlds.org/dakota-sioux-lived-georgia/>.

[vii] Anthony, Piers. Tatham Mound. p.502

[viii] Laudonniere, Rene. Three Voyages. p.76.

[ix] Laudonniere, Rene. Three Voyages. pp. 102-103.

[x] Le Moyne, Jacques. Floridae Americae Provinciae Recens & exactissima descriptio Auctore Iacobo le Moyne cui cognomen de Morgues, Qui Laudonnierum. Frankfurt, 1591. Accessed online 13 January 2017 at < https://www.raremaps.com/gallery/detail/44426/Floridae_Americae_Provinciae_Recens_and_exactissima_descriptio_Auctore_Iacobo/Le%20Moyne.html>.

[xi] Barrientos, Bartolome. Pedro Menendez de Aviles: Founder of Florida. p.115.

[xii] “Altamaha River State Canoe Guide.” AltamahaRiver.org. Accessed online 16 May 2014 at < http://www.altamahariver.org/map2012.pdf>.

[xiii] Laudonniere, Rene. Three Voyages. p.89.

[xiv] Lakota Dictionary Online. Lakotadictionary.org. Accessed online 7 January 2017 at <http://www.lakotadictionary.org/nldo.php#>

[xv] Daniels, Gary C. “Dakota Sioux Once Lived in Georgia?” LostWorlds.org. Accessed online 13 January 2017 at < http://lostworlds.org/dakota-sioux-lived-georgia/>.

[xvi] “Alachua Trail.” KingsleyLake.org. Accessed online 13 January 2017 at <http://www.kingsleylake.org/facts/history/AlachuaTrail.html>.

[xvii] Daniels, Gary C. “Bartram’s Fevertree Helps Pinpoint Fort Caroline Location?” TheNewWorld.us. Accessed online 13 January 2017 at <https://thenewworld.us/bartrams-fevertree-helps-pinpoint-fort-caroline-location/>.

Tagged with  

Comments are closed.